When reading these final sections of The Grey Woman, one in particular kind of struck me, and it was
when the woman finally gives birth to her child, she states “my poor worse than
fatherless child. It was a girl, as I had prayed for. I had feared lest a boy
might have something of the tiger nature of its father, but a girl seemed all
my own”. I find it interesting that she says that she had wished for a female
child because she was then all her own, as if the girl, just by being a girl
would then not be able to inherit the attributes of her father as a male child
would, and would then be completely like her mother. I guess this sort of
struck me in the sense that of course there is the possibility that the little
girl could end up just as her father, but it also sort of continues this line
of thinking with the child and the monstrous that has popped up in various
places throughout the semester, as usually children are the figures of
innocence, but here even with birth, the male child would possibly be marked as
a monster. Of course this also has to do a lot with gender, but I just found
that passage intriguing, especially if to go by what has happened within the
story, the female child could end up later on in life in just as poor a
situation as her mother for her gender, but that outcome was not considered. But these are just some thoughts I had.
1 comment:
Is it possible that not only is the male child exclusively able to inherit this "tiger nature" due to his gender being identical to the parent with the "tiger nature," but also could this signify a greater lack of innocence in males than females?
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.