Thursday, October 10, 2013

Dracula and Imperialism

Early in the book, Dracula’s account of history is essentially a reflection of his own qualities, especially the more negative ones. He proudly announces that he is a part of “a conquering race” and quite frequently mentions Attila the Hun, who is known as a violent imperialist ruler. In addition, he even speaks of Attila lovingly and seems to cherish the connection: “What devil or what witch was ever so great as Attila, whose blood is in these veins?” (34). Dracula has no problem with Attila’s inclination to violence and murder, or that he conquered numerous races in an effort to expand his own empire; instead, Dracula seems to look up to him as a role model. This seems particularly important in understanding Dracula’s relationships with other characters. For example, Renfield (poor, poor Renfield, who I desperately want to hug/engage in conversation) is the perfect target for Dracula. Because Renfield is considered “mad” or insane, he is in a more vulnerable position in society. Thus, it easy for Dracula to “conquer” him and expand his own power, much like his idol Attila did. Dracula benefits from targeting such a vulnerable individual in society, as it makes Renfield more likely to submit to him; for his disadvantaged position prevents him from overcoming Dracula’s power. Therefore, Dracula takes on a rather imperialistic role by exerting his power and control over the weaker individuals in society. Dracula seems to mirror the imperialistic nature of his history, but rather than economic or political control, he is seeking power and control over human beings.

On a related note, NBC is apparently airing a tv adaptation of Dracula starring Jonathan Rhys Meyers. You know, the guy from The Tudors? Here is the trailer:

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Your post is interesting as it ties into something that I have been thinking about when reading the novel regarding Dracula's motives or reasons for going to London in the first place, after having spent so long a time in his own country. As to this point, with the exception of the first few chapters, the story has not been about Dracula at all, but those who are being affected by his presence, so the reader doesn't really get to know why. Possibly due to the fact that he was withering away there, growing older without the blood of the people to sustain him, but it seems that his imperial history may have a lot to do with it as well, a man born to conquer and in need of new people to conquer, however this time through more modern means and without an army.

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.