Twice in the first episode of the BBC adaptation Jekyll, we see “Hyde”, Thomas Jackman’s
other half, become even more monstrous, transforming into almost a kind of
beast, complete with fangs, and he nearly “kills” two people, as well as leaves
a threatening message that he had killed Jackman’s family. Of course each time,
the audience is only led to believe that he would commit such an act, and nothing
so sinister ever truly happens, but it is interesting that this aspect of Hyde
is what the show has chosen to play up.
Several times he mentions “playing
lions”, first with the girl in the alleyway and then in his recording to
Jackman, and in his behavior, he seems to toy with people, much like a lion or
cat may toy with its prey, and when he is cornered, such as in the bar scene,
he lashes out like trapped animal would.
There seems then, to be a strong link
between him and the animal world, which sort of drew me back to the Darwin
discussion that we had in class a few sessions ago, as this Hyde, although his
usual appearance doesn’t suggest it as much as Stevenson’s Hyde does, as he
does not appear “dwarfish” or “ape-like”, retains this sense of the untamed
beast that goes beyond the description of him being child-like that the show seems to
give. He seems to me, to be something more primitive that rises up out of mankind, overtaking
Jackman and dragging him kicking and screaming back down the ladder of evolution for periods of time.
1 comment:
I agree with Tara's interpretation of Hyde's animalistic tendencies. The portrayal of Hyde as an improved cousin who wins the favor of Jackman's family is a much scarier prospect than the mental image of the novel Hyde. The Gothic feeling is embellished nicely in the TV adaptation with their choice to focus on Hyde embodying a subtle definition of animal.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.